|Home | About Me|
Fire in the Blood Reviews
Author: Richard Otter
Reviewed by David Whyld
The introduction to Fire In The Blood is quite a bit better than those in Richard Otterís previous games and does a good job of setting the scene. Your wife has been murdered and you have decided to find the killer, and then exact a little Ďpaybackí for their crime. Unfortunately there are a number of things which bring the game down. As with all of the authorís previous works (with the exception of the mini-comp gamp We Are Coming To Get You!), there an abundance of items scattered all over the place, the purpose of which is sometimes difficult to figure out. As you wander around the game, you'll pick up more and more items and while there are a few that serve an obvious purpose (the spade and some of the weapons), the majority just seem to be either red herrings or ones whose purpose isnít easy to discern. Then, too, there are the NPCs. There are a fair number of them moving around the game. On the plus side, they can be questioned about a wide range of subjects and can offer some useful information. On the down side, they arenít very interesting characters. The descriptions for them are often brief and to the point and what they say isnít anything particularly rewarding. On top of that, their dialogue tends to be italicized and features very poor grammar, thus the reading of it is often stilted.
By far the gameís worse aspect is the way the player will frequently react in unlikely ways:
You are suddenly overwhelmed by a complete feeling of depression and you shout to yourself, "If only that meeting hadn't gone on so long!Ē
You are suddenly overwhelmed by a complete feeling of worthlessness and you hear yourself mutter, "Jane."
A dozen or more times during my first play through the game, I saw this happening and it got steadily more irritating the longer I played. Just like the creepy sensations that featured in the authorís last game, Darkness, this sort of thing is fine when used in moderation but too often and it makes the player come across as some kind of babbling idiot.
The hardest thing about Fire In The Blood is, as with other games by the author, trying to figure out just what needs to be done. This is clearly an author who doesnít believe in making his games easy to get into. You are presented with a large number of locations to explore, NPCs to interact with and items to collect, but actually guessing how you're supposed to make a start with finding your wifeís murderers isnít clear. In a smaller game with less NPCs and less items, it might be possible to hit upon the correct path by trying everything and just hoping something works. In a game the size as this one, you're likely to struggle. I think Iíd been playing for about an hour, had collected over a dozen items, visited every location I could find and had spoken to every NPC there wasÖ and then I just found myself at a loss as to how I was supposed to get any further. Short of asking every single NPC in the game about every single subject I could think of Ė a mammoth task considering the number of NPCs and possible subjects Ė itís hard to know what needs to be done. I even ended up strangling some guy in the park with a rope just because he was there, I had the rope and the game would let me do it. Was he the guilty party? I donít know but it felt so good to actually be doing something instead of trying to figure out things to do, that I just killed him anyway. Fortunately there's a good hints system to fall back upon. I was reluctant to use this to begin with as I tend to think using the hints system is cheating, but unless you're amazingly good at text adventures, or just amazingly persistent, itís likely you're going to find yourself consulting the hints again and again.
Relying on the hints soon reveals several things about the game that are likely to get the better of all but the most persistent of players. Characters need to be asked about other characters yet there never seems to be any clear reason why the player would question them about these characters. Maybe I'm missing something and the clues are there after all, or maybe the author just expects everyone to either be amazingly persistent and question every character about every other character, or to use the hints system as often as possible. Dealing with the people who killed your wife is a difficult task, not helped much by the fact that obvious commands donít seem to be recognised half of the time. I successfully managed to uncover who one of the killers was (well, okay I followed the hints) but after admitting to me that he had killed her, I then tried to kill him only to be hit with the unhelpful ADRIFT default command of ďnow that isnít very niceĒ.
The hints also led me to a strange little occurrence which might be a bug or might just be me. One hint advises me that I can use the bottle as a weapon if I break it. So I type ďbreak bottleĒ only to have someone shout at me not to break it in my current location (the old tennis court). So I leave the old tennis court and try again to break it. This time I'm told I donít have the bottle. Sure enough, I check my inventory and see I donít have it (turns out I gave it away earlier on). Puzzled, I go back to the old tennis court and again try to break the bottle and again get shouted at. Examining the tennis court doesnít reveal a bottle to me so I'm not quite sure what's going on but clearly the game seems to expect me to break a bottle here. Weird.
To begin with, I liked Fire In The Blood but the more I played it, the less it appealed to me. Itís a large and pretty much directionless game in which nothing is very clear and the only progress you are likely to make is either via the hints or sheer dogged persistence. The writing is average but never becomes anything better than that, and the NPCs are just not really interesting enough to care about. The author needs to work on adding some much needed emotional content to his games.
5 out of 10
Reviewed by Robert Rafgon
I was a beta tester for this game, but I have replayed the latest version to write this review. The story of this game is about a husband who wants revenge for his murdered wife. This game does feature some violence, which you would expect in a game based on revenge. I have to admit that I didn't identify well with the player character and felt a little uncomfortable, as I personally believe more in forgiveness than revenge. I didn't mind the violence, only the motives slightly bothered me. However, I was willing to put this aside in order to enjoy the game.
The story and writing are fine and do well in expressing the husband's grief, although it does sometimes go a little over the top. I haven't been in anywhere close to this situation though, so it is difficult to judge. The game does not always succeed in providing clues to identify the culprits in the investigation, but this is difficult to do well, as most clues in games like this are generally either too obvious or too subtle. One feature that I really like is that there are multiple solutions to many of the puzzles. There are less red herrings than in the author's previous games, as most of the items can be used for some kind of solution. This provides more variety to the gameplay.
Overall I liked this game. I am always ready for more good action-filled games.
SCORE - 6/10
Reviewed by DIY Games (April 2005)
This is a very engaging and dark adventure game. Your wife
has been brutally murdered, and now you are out for revenge. To make matters
worse, you are no hero, and you live in a rough city with very rough people
around. Youíll need to employ all your brain cells to find the murderers and
deal with them accordingly. This Adrift title is one of the better interactive
fiction games released in April.
Reviewed by TDS
You are Peter Carling. Your wife was killed in a small town and now you must find the culprits and avenge your wife.
This game starts you off in a town with a note with the name of the guy you think killed your wife on it. So you go around questioning the inhabitants and getting evidence on who killed her. Then you kill them.
The writing in Darkness, Richard Otter's previous game, was average and sounded serious but the writing here is pretty bad and sounds unintentionally funny. It's hard to take the game serious because of the things the npcs foolishly reveal. You ask a npc about another npc and he might tell you he saw him murder a person. Other times you'd see someone wearing your wife's jewelry and ask them about it, and they'd hint to them murdering her. They're could've been better ways to get that information in a more realistic manner.
It sounds like the author is trying to give us some direction of what to do but I feel that's the wrong way to go about it.
ō take gloves
You take the pair of gloves.
ō wear gloves
Slipping on the gloves and smiling to yourself you think, "These would stop any fingerprints appearing on anything I touch."
Even with the pointing out of the obvious around every corner the game still suffers from a lack of direction. It's not a linear game but it could be written better than you thinking up ways to kill seperate people. The npcs are unbelievable and mostly cardboard cut-outs and info tanks.
The gameplay is basically a bunch of lock and key puzzles and interrogating every npc. A thin story is formed throughout and there seems to be lots of possibilities on what you can do. There are joke/useless items scattered all over the town that you can play around with.
The npcs are coded well. They move around, talk to you, pick their noses, etc.. The problem is there isn't a story behind them. Not even a good story behind the player character. I soon learned my character wasn't one that avenges his wife by putting her killers in jail, but a complete nut who runs around killing people.
You are suddenly overwhelmed by a complete feeling of despair and you hear yourself mutter, "Jane."
Messages like that happen about every 5 or 6 turns and I think I'm playing a nutcase. His fragile state of mind makes me believe I'm playing an anti-hero. I know little about my wife to care for her and even less about the people I'm killing!
The people I'm killing have no souls and I don't know if killing them really is vengeance. I feel there could've been more of a reason...or more of a story.
If you liked Darkness, you'll like this. It's another key hunt, this time with npcs that you can interact with (even if it is limited).
Reviews should be considered copyrighted by their respective authors.
|Any donation would be much appreciated to help keep the site online and growing.||To help make your donation quicker and
easier just click the "Donate" button and you
will be taken to the secure Paypal donation page.
|Home | About Me|