Home About Me

DELRON

The Home of Otter Interactive Fiction

Jim Pond & the Agents of F.A.R.T. Reviews
Author: David Whyld
Date: 2003
ADRIFT 4.0


Reviewed by Cannibal

ORIGINALITY: [07] PLAYABILITY: [EIGHT] MECHANICS: [EIGHT] ENTERTAINMENT [EIGHT] 

Comments: 

"Tearing off across town, I execute several short cuts I know and, twenty minutes later, come to a screeching halt in Picador Lane. After allowing the window cleaner to climb down off my bonnet, I study my surroundings and wonder what to do next..." 

Does Davidw do serious? Hell, no, the comedy injected into each and every game is back with a vengance in this highly amusing and engaging spy spoof - the final fight scene is pretty hilarious. 

The writing is very organised and polished, as usual, and the puzzles are good and of a varied degree of difficulty. The opening scenes with your boss P are utter nonsense (very funny, in other words) and the plot is no thinner than any Bond film. In fact, the plot seems better! 

Cast as Jim Pond you have to infiltrate the Federation of American Redneck Terrorists (FART) and almost immediately have a companion in Orinoko, who knows he faces certain death for no reward and is more than happy to tag along. 

This is a very good quality and highly amusing game. Davidw has a good working forumla for these type of games and it does seem to pay off each and everytime. 


Reviewed by Mel S

Nice, Short Game 

Unlike a lot of Davidw's games, Jim Pond 1 is not of epic length, and only contains a handful of locations. But, it does have some replay value, so you may end up playing it more than once. 

If you've played the Scene of the Crime games, you'll feel right at home with this game. This is almost a sequel to the series, the only difference being you're a spy instead of a detective. Other than that, they share the same style and humour. 

It's more of a small game in between David's bigger ones, but it's still enjoyable and fun to play. 

7/10


Reviewed by Woodfish

Good but silly... 

I've never been that much of a fan of davidw's games. When I play interactive fiction, I like it to seem real as I play. I like games where you actually feel as if you are there, or where you can picture everything going on. I don't often get this feeling with davidw's games. This isn't because they're not well-written, because they are - it's just that their style is too jokey and whimsical for me. 

I do like comedy games to some degree, just not a full-blown gag-per-line jokefest like Jim Pond. My view of a perfect comedy game is one that has well written, descriptive room and object descriptions, well-defined characters, an engaging plot, with some funny observations, situations, and speech in it - not a game in which nearly every sentence is littered with one-liners. 

Of course, I realise this game is meant to be lighthearted, and I appreciate that, but this seemed too whimsical and nonsensical for my liking. There were quite a few funny lines, and it was a well-detailed game, but it didn't seem real enough. For instance, this game often makes reference to the fact that it is a game (eg. "There's also a door here but as might be expected in a game like this it's annoyingly locked"), which some people might like, but I don't. 

In fact, this could be the key to how davidw gets so many games released (this is just an observation, by the way, not critisism). When I make a game, I have to have everything real, and backed up with reasoning. For example, we don't get any real description of what the carpark looks like at the beginning, and it only contains two locations. The way out is blocked by a locked door. How did the player get in the carpark to start with, if he doesn't have the key to get in? Things like that get me when I'm playing a game, and I take steps to avoid that sort of thing. Even if I'm writing a comedy game, I still make it logical. I realise stuff like that doesn't bother most people, and it can't bother davidw particularly. So perhaps the key to releasing games is to not think about it too much, in regard to logic and reasoning. Again, this is not meant to put down or critisise davidw, it's just speculation. 

Most of the nouns in room descriptions were backed up by objects, and I didn't encounter many bugs, apart from one in Mr Orinoko's office with his dead body. The game design was quite good, apart from a few issues with game logic, and I thought the structure was good. 

I can see there is a lot of time put into this game, and it is very detailed and some parts are quite entertaining - it's just that it's not really my sort of game. I think it deserves a high score, though, because it is really a good game, which did make me laugh out loud on a few occasions. 

7 / 10 


Reviews should be considered copyrighted by their respective authors.

 

Any donation would be much appreciated to help keep the site online and growing.
To help make your donation quicker and easier just click the "Donate" button and you
will be taken to the secure Paypal donation page.
    Home  |  About Me