Home About Me

DELRON

The Home of Otter Interactive Fiction

Marooned Reviews
Author: Bruce Davis
Date: 2006
ADRIFT 4.0


Reviewed by Paul O'Brian

Marooned was the first ADRIFT game I've ever played. Anytime I review a game whose system is new to me, that review can't help but be partly about the system as well as the game itself, since it's often difficult to disentangle who is responsible for what in the overall playing experience. Unfortunately, what with all the growling on the newsgroups from ADRIFT advocates who feel their system isn't getting a fair shake, it's a little tough to advance an opinion on it -- anything less than unadulterated praise runs the risk of getting me labelled a "snob" or an "elitist" or something. Nonetheless, I shall brave the waters, and try to discuss the entire experience of playing Marooned, starting with the things for which I suspect ADRIFT was responsible, then moving on to those things that I'm guessing were done by the game's author.

In the interest of diverting the WOAA (Wrath of ADRIFT Advocates), I'll even begin with the things I liked about the interface. The ADRIFT runtime has a clean environment with two windows: one for the command line and one for the game text. The overall presentation was attractive and aesthetic, though the text window used a few too many newlines for my taste. One particularly interesting feature is that clicking on any word in the text window will insert that word into the command line. I'm too much of a typist to be messing with the mouse in that fashion, but I can see where it could be a really cool feature, especially after one got used to it. (I was so unused to it at first, unaware of it in fact, that when I clicked back onto the interpreter window after doing something in another window, I accidentally clicked on a command word and couldn't figure out why the game seemed to be executing commands without my typing them!)

A similar convenience is the "auto-complete" option, which allows you to just type a couple of letters from any dictionary word and attempts to guess what you mean, Microsoft-style. This option was a little wonky at times -- for example, you find a "dented gas can" at one point which the game will auto-complete if you start typing "gas", but not if you start with "dented" or "can". Still, quirkiness aside, this was a great time saver, because it also shows you right away which nouns in the descriptions haven't been implemented.

Some other cool options are available from the menu bar, most notably an excellent automapper, which operates in a separate window but creates a lovely map of the game's landscape. This is an innovation for which many people have been clamoring, and it was especially welcome in this game, where many of the locations have the exact same name. There's also a "control panel" which can execute common commands for you, even a "goto" command which gives you a listbox of discovered locations and sends you there via the best path.

Finally, I must mention that I appreciated the inclusion of "Verbose" as a menu option, something I can just leave turned on for all games rather than having to explicitly request it each time. 

OK, so there are a substantial of things I liked about the ADRIFT interface. Sadly, there are also a number of things I really hated. First and foremost is the problem of the parser. ADRIFT's parser violates all three of the current tenets in Paul's Parser Manifesto (which I made up in response to another nonstandard parser, the one in last year's homebrew game "Lunatix".) Those tenets are as follows: 

1. Parsers must not pretend to understand more than they do. 

2. Parsers must not give smarmy, unhelpful error messages. 

3. Parsers must not ask questions without being prepared to receive an answer. 

Well, I'm not actually sure it breaks #3 -- I got too angry to try it. The exchange went something like this (I've inserted prompts before my commands for clarity's sake -- ADRIFT doesn't put command prompts in its text): 

> look in it 
(the first aid kit) 
This is a standard issue first aid kit. The first aid kit is open. Inside the first aid kit is a small bottle. 
> x bottle 
This is a small bottle for pills. The bottle is closed. 
> open bottle 
You open the small bottle. 
> look in it 
(the small bottle) 
This is a small bottle for pills. The bottle is open. 
> x bottle 
This is a small bottle for pills. The bottle is open. 
> look in bottle 
This is a small bottle for pills. The bottle is open. 
> empty bottle 
I don't understand what you want me to do with the small bottle. 
> get all from bottle 
You are not holding a small bottle. 
> get it 
(the small bottle) 
You are not holding a first aid kit. 
> get kit 
Take what? 

> ^%$# you! [Expletive removed to protect the easily offended] I really don't think there's any need for language like that! Frustrating exchanges like this were not uncommon, but even more infuriating were ADRIFT's violations of tenet #2. Probably the worst offender was this one: 

>undo 
I can't undo your blundering. 

Let me tell you an easy way to get me angry fast: give me an insulting message in response to a reasonable command. This one broke all previous speed records. Finally, there were the violations of tenet #1, most obvious when you type "x [anything the parser doesn't understand]" -- instead of telling you it didn't understand you, it just says "Nothing special." I hope that Santa will still bring me presents this year despite the fact that I couldn't resist typing "x adrift." All these parser problems more than blew away any pleasure I derived from ADRIFT's other innovations, because the parser is more important than the nifty features. Let me say that one more time, and listen up, system authors: THE PARSER IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE NIFTY FEATURES. Further crippling the ADRIFT experience was the sublimely aggravating policy that there is no scripting option as such -- only a menu command that will record a transcript of the game *thus far*, a command that is naturally unavailable after a game ends! Who uses scripting, you ask? I do -- I use it to write reviews. 

Because I didn't find my way around this misfeature until I'd been playing Marooned for an hour or so, it's difficult for me to assess my experience with much accuracy, except to say this: Marooned is not the game I'd use to champion ADRIFT. To the problems in ADRIFT's parser, this game adds its own irritations. For one thing, there's a starvation puzzle. Game designers, please quit it with the starvation puzzles. Like mazes, they were interesting long ago, but no longer. They're not clever, they're not challenging, and they're not fun -- they just suck. This one was especially offensive because none of the food you find actually staves off starvation, and a couple of perfectly legitimate food items aren't edible, according to the game. Compounding this problem is the fact that there are tons of red herrings in the game, which means that you waste your time trying to figure out how to use something that's actually useless, and consequently you keep dying over, and over, and over again. Dull, dull, dull, and ultimately rage- inducing. The premise of the game was fine, but it's hampered by severe design problems, as well as the more fundamental weaknesses of the ADRIFT interface. All in all, I'd rather play Guess the Verb again. 

Rating: 3.6 


Reviewed by Dorothy Millard

After finishing with some afternoon fishing, you notice some rather dark and menacing clouds have snuck up on you.  While preparing to head back to port, the wind picks up and jagged streaks of lightning stab the sky.  A heavy rain begins to pelt you.  The waves grow stronger and threaten to dump you in the raging ocean.  Dark clouds drift overhead and the ocean swirls angrily around the boat.  You can barely make out anything in front of you.  Despite your attempts to keep the boat upright, a huge wave hits you and dumps you into the raging ocean.  Thus the game commences with you marooned on some kind of apparently uninhabited island.  You must get off this speck in the middle of
the ocean.

You are free to explore the island in this traditional type game. It was nice to see a game with a different colour scheme (I've been playing too many Z Code games).  The ADRIFT Interpreter completes words for you, for example if you type "x c" it will complete the word to read x clothes.  Sometimes it completes with the wrong word, for example I wanted to type IN but I got INVENTORY instead, but if you keep typing the correct letters appear and so long as you are aware of it, it's not a problem. Additionally Auto-Correct can be turned off if this annoys you. The ADRIFT Interpreter also has a Control Panel with all the standard commands such as Examine, Pick Up, Wear, Remove, Goto,
Help etc, which can be used with the mouse.  You can also use the mouse to point to the text instead of typing words and in fact, if you wish, most actions can be accomplished using the mouse. Marooned is nothing new or special, but fun anyway, despite its low ranking in the IF Competition.


Reviewed by MathBrush

In this game, you are marooned on a small island, and you have to get off.

Like most adrift games, the parser is poor and has disambiguation trouble.

The game has a lot of under-described locations. And there is really no hint on what you are supposed to be doing. Also the walkthrough says to take tires, but the game says they are too heavy.

Overall, this seems like a really ambitious game with moving NPCs and fire simulation, but it was probably too big to polish up in time for the comp.


Reviews should be considered copyrighted by their respective authors.

 

Any donation would be much appreciated to help keep the site online and growing.
To help make your donation quicker and easier just click the "Donate" button and you
will be taken to the secure Paypal donation page.
    Home  |  About Me