Home About Me

DELRON

The Home of Otter Interactive Fiction

The Pilfers Reviews
Author: Daniel Budle
Date: 2006
ADRIFT 4.0


Comments on Adrift Forum

Author needs to work on grammar and spelling. Too many run-on sentences and mispelled words. Red room puzzle is ridiculous (once you read the paper you have 20 turns??) and blue room puzzle is nicely stolen from Labyrinth (but I appreciate that). 1.

love the labrynth style 1st puzzle and a great introduction (even though blatently clear word spell checker was used>.<) shame about the ending, but then again reminds me of teh Cube films, the masters of vague endings. 7.

A wordy sci-fi introduction led neatly into some massive confusion as I repeatedly tried to examine objects before I realised that I had to read the instructions before I was allowed to see anything. This wasn't too much of a problem, but it didn't really make sense either. I couldn't solve the first puzzle logically (I thought it was the other door, and those weren't the questions I wanted to ask), but it wasn't random and eventually I just went the other way. The second room really summed things up. Key objects weren't implimented (if I have to interact with an object, I should at least be able to see it), and I had to examine and prod every single thing multiple times to get past the gtv. There were a few typos, more than the other entries, but not enough to seriously detract from the game. But the lack of implimentation did. The story was okay though, and I eventually managed to complete it after peeking. 3

This one is a lot different than the others, having a meaty intro for a start. Needs some work on the grammar and spelling though (Terrance awakes awakes in a blue room, for example).

I don't really understand the blue room puzzle. I managed to get through out of chance. Probably just me being thick, though! The puzzle in the red room was frustrating, because I couldn't examine the light bulb or the cable. Then when I 'took' the bulb, I could examine the bulb, which simultaneously existing hanging (barely) from the ceiling, and in my inventory. After this, if I want to take the bulb (from the desk, say), I have to stand on the bed! I also see from the generator that I can only view the hole if I do look*hole, when I always use x - so I didn't notice this for the longest time. Also, other attempts to break the window indicate that there's no point in trying.

I found this game okay, but ultimately more frustrating than fun. 4.

Liked the truth/lie puzzle, not so keen on the time limit. 5.

I think there may have been some contradiction in the beggining of this game, where both mic's say yes to question C&3. 3.5

Judging from the writer's posts on the forum (spelling and grammar errors galore), I had a horrible feeling this was going to be bad. And it was. Frequent spelling misakes ("avarage"), terrible writing and almost no item descriptions are implemented. 90% of the game's text seems to be in the introduction. The first room has a couple of doors but I can't examine them; the second has a light bulb and a cable that can't be examined. I couldn't force myself to continue playing after that. 1.

A little too much fiction, not enough interaction with this confused piece of work. If the massively over-descriptive beginning- which could have been summed up to the same effect in two sentences-doesn't put you off, then the first puzzle will. Due to a number of bugs, it would seem it simply requires guess-work in the end. 

The second room and puzzle sequence is very average, but the ending, although rushed, is conclusive and ties the story up as best as possible.
A valiant attempt. 2. 


Reviews should be considered copyrighted by their respective authors.

 

Any donation would be much appreciated to help keep the site online and growing.
To help make your donation quicker and easier just click the "Donate" button and you
will be taken to the secure Paypal donation page.
    Home  |  About Me